Students General
269 topics in this forum
-
- 62 replies
- 14.8k views
-
- 56 replies
- 12.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 996 views
-
- 2 replies
- 242 views
-
- 3 replies
- 441 views
-
- 0 replies
- 138 views
-
- 5 replies
- 634 views
-
- 5 replies
- 485 views
-
- 16 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 316 views
-
- 17 replies
- 910 views
-
- 6 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 364 views
-
- 6 replies
- 673 views
-
- 6 replies
- 697 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 14 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 3 replies
- 482 views
-
- 26 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 507 views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 17 replies
- 3.7k views
-
- 24 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 8 replies
- 725 views
-
What's Happening
-
2
Legal field entry question
1. "Work in collections, and then the law is a "natural career progression". It's really not. I mean, you can switch careers anytime. I could become a beekeeper tomorrow. But a job in collections does not inexorably, or "naturally", progress into a career in law. That's just odd." The answer to this lies in myself expanding onto "why law? : "I was equally drawn to the field out of deep curiosity for such studies, apprehension for legal intellectual work demand, possibility of a profound dive into one career field for life." Such type of education as a BA in arts and a specific work background in collections could sometimes converge logically into an interest in law. Journalistic background can spark interest in law, as can the exposure to the collections case management (through seeing some legal intricacies within collections). 2. I am trying to test out more practically my interest in the legal field, therefore decided to start with a gradual exposure, not "an all in" and the highest level of responsibility possible. It is a big choice to be made, so for me it requires time and direct exposure to the field. That's why I am using this route and not going into "LSAT+law school+" yet. I want to test waters by being an assistant in a law firm or working as a court and client service representative with a choice still being in the making. There are threads with stories of legal assistants even on this forum who pursued their law degrees following this type of work. I am not sure which "oddness"/inconsistence you are targeting here. And fortunately, firms that did interview me did not feel I was spamming and there was enough qualifications present to interview in the first place. It is possible to get into such role without relevant education, just harder. I agree that volunteering side might be of an odd turn, but not for all. Thank you for commenting. -
2
Legal field entry question
Yeah, there's a lot going on here. I'm just responding because I suspect few others will. There's some sort of communication barrier, for one thing - I don't feel like I fully understand what you're saying. I don't mean to be unkind here. But the best advice I can give is that you seem to have a very odd and indirect approach to pursuing your goals. The "legal field" is not a temple which one "enters". You develop the skills to get the job you want. Getting jobs is not always easy, but in most cases, it's very simple, and you seem to be having some trouble with the notion that you can just go from A to B. You're saying, "Well, I'm at A, and I'm trying to get to B, so obviously I went to J, so now how do I get from J to T?" And it's, like, you don't? You just go from A to B? If you would like to be a lawyer, the path is extremely clear: write the LSAT, apply to law school, gain admission, attend law school, pass the bar. The steps couldn't be clearer. If you don't have the grades or the LSAT, it might be difficult, but it's clear how you do it. You don't do it by getting a job as an assistant in a law firm. That's actually a completely unrelated job. I know very few lawyers who were ever legal assistants. If you'd like to be a paralegal, again, there's a career path for that. I'm a paraprofessional serving lawyers. There's, again, a very clear career path to get my job: you get the relevant education, develop the relevant experience, and then apply for the job, and then you get the job, because you have the education and the experience. How it doesn't work is: 1. Work in collections, and then the law is a "natural career progression". It's really not. I mean, you can switch careers anytime. I could become a beekeeper tomorrow. But a job in collections does not inexorably, or "naturally", progress into a career in law. That's just odd. 2. Applying for jobs you presumably aren't qualified for (lawyers want paralegals who are certified paralegals, and legal assistants who are experienced legal assistants) to "receive a significant legal exposure". For one thing, if you're spamming out 140 job applications to things you're presumably not qualified for, that's not going to end well. I could apply for ten million jobs as a brain surgeon and I'm never going to get one. Second of all, you don't need a job as a legal assistant to become a lawyer. Plenty of lawyers are 24 and have never worked at a job before graduating from law school. Not only are you beating your head against a wall, you're beating your head against a wall that's completely unrelated to what you want to do. 3. Volunteering at what would ordinarily be a paid job is...look, I'm not a lawyer and I'm not going to speak to the legalities of it, but it is an extremely bizarre thing to do in most industries. If a law firm that's declined to hire you gets a letter from you saying, "I'm so interested in you that I'll work there for free!", they will think, "Well, this person is extremely bizarre." Being thought of that way is not usually the key to success. Offering to volunteer at a law firm as a legal assistant as a way of becoming a lawyer is just...it's strange. Did you get your job in collections by saying to the boss, "Hey, I really want some exposure the world of collections, so I would love to be a custodian in your building to help me work my way up to working in collections, and if you won't hire me, I'll clean your toilets for free"? No. Because that would be weird. You got the job by having skills the job called for. You want to be a lawyer, go do the things you need to do to become a lawyer. "Volunteering at a law firm as a legal assistant" is...the maximum amount of not being one of those things.- 2
-
-
1
Opinions on the Laurier-Sussex Law Degree Program
The folks on reddit are correct. Complete a regular undergraduate degree, write the LSAT and attend a Canadian school if your goal is to work in Canada.- 5
-
-
2
Legal field entry question
Hello all, I need to reach out for some “outside-of-my-box” advice. I am few months into 30, have a French BA in Literature (2019), light experience in journalism in mid-20s and most formatory work experience within collections in a corporate world environment. Since late 20s I envisioned myself in law as a natural career progression; I was equally drawn to the field out of deep curiosity for such studies, apprehension for legal intellectual work demand, possibility of a profound dive into one career field for life. In addition, I uncovered I am inherently drawn to speak up for others (and myself) and terminated+got dismissed because of disputing employment practices. I am considering the employment law of course, as of present. Since late fall 2023, I have finally set onto a path. Plan was to receive a significant legal exposure (secure legal assistant position) + prepare henceforward for the LSAT. Unfortunately, even with valuable work experiences under my belt I was not been able to get myself into a firm or a court. My results as of today: ~140 applications, 6/6 after-interview rejections, few in-person CV distributions (with rejections, of course), all close network with ability to open doors involved (no results, as of yet). My search region is broad. I am in a mentorship program with a known lawyer. Currently, also applying to non-legal roles. I am moderating my “desperados”, but now considering the option of volunteering as a legal assistant. It seems that the worst has come: more than 6 months without work + still no exposure to the legal field. I clearly recognize the error of not selling my candidature more aggressively, the naïvete that experience + bilingualism should open the door into an entry-level legal role. I might have underworked my interview preparation, but this is being taken care of now. My plan today is to write out solid cover letters for law firms I am interested in and volunteer being a legal assistant there. Then, promote myself into a paid position. Or just move into a different law firm. If this option does not get me in, I will get a 1-year paralegal education. I sense my case is not hopeless, yet I am beginning to panic (loss of time, organisation practices, people skills, etc). Anything I am missing out in terms of a bigger picture of my legal field entry? Search or presentation tactics I have yet to employ? Also, any thoughts on the paralegal education - is it a loss of time if one wants to become a lawyer ? Thank you for an advice and/or a bird’s eye view. -
0
Post-articling job search
Given posted jobs for new calls are few and far between, I'm curious if anyone has any advice on how to find first year associate positions, or any insight into how the market is generally for solicitor jobs right now in Vancouver. Seems like many students are in the market for post-articling associate positions this year so may be a useful discussion for many people. -
1
Opinions on the Laurier-Sussex Law Degree Program
I have applied and been accepted into Wilfred Laurier (Waterloo) concurrent law program that offers a undergraduate degree here in Canada and a law degree over in the UK. However, folks over at Reddit have said that this program is mostly a scam and provides far fewer career opportunities as a lawyer. Should I proceed with my program or switch to a normal undergraduate degree and apply to a Canadian Law School if I were to continue to pursue with law? Let me know what your thoughts are on this program. Thanks everyone! -
33
Accepted to Saskatchewan 2024
Congrats on the A!! Have you submitted all final marks yet? -
2
TMU VS Ottawa
Can confirm this is the case. When I was in the same position as OP, I calculated the total cost difference between the two schools assuming that I would live at home while attending TMU vs living on my own while attending UOttawa being approximately $50,000-70,000. The main factor causing the $20,000 range was how much I wanted to spend on my housing arrangement in Ottawa. -
54
Accepted 2024
Provisionally accepting Windsor as I haven’t heard back from any other schools except TMU and Windsor. No rejections or waitlists anywhere else, so I chose to provisionally accept Windsor while I wait to hear back from other schools as I had Windsor above TMU as my personal choice.- 1
-
-
33
Accepted to Saskatchewan 2024
Also got an acceptance email at 2am. 3.98 GPA, 155 LSAT. Will likely be declining. -
54
Accepted 2024
Out of curiosity, what other offer are you taking? -
33
Accepted to Saskatchewan 2024
Got an email at 2am that I was accepted! AB resident. 3.7/4.3 GPA (I believe). 150->155->159 LSAT. Still doesn't feel real. Waiting to hear back from UofA but will likely accept. -
54
Accepted 2024
I’m in the same boat as what was stated above, just for reference.- 1
-
-
0
Interview
Has anyone done the Oz interview? What questions do they ask? -
2
TMU VS Ottawa
Which practice areas are you interested in? Also, are you wealthy? Ottawa will cost you at least 30k more with living expenses.
-
