Jump to content

Insurance Defence Salary


Ex1L

Recommended Posts

Ex1L
  • Lawyer

Review season is coming up. Let's talk salary! I know us insurance defence people aren't getting the bump that Bay Street received, but let's discuss where everyone is at in terms of salary range.

I understand second year salaries at Bell Temple and McCague Borlack are in the $110,000 range. Wondering what other people can speak to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MagnaCarter
  • Lawyer

That salary seems on the higher end for the industry, but billable targets are not the same across the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blurg
  • Lawyer

I’m aware from a few firms that typically starting salary is around $90k with $10k bumps yearly. Targets for those firms would be around 1650. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ex1L
  • Lawyer
On 3/10/2022 at 2:42 PM, MagnaCarter said:

That salary seems on the higher end for the industry, but billable targets are not the same across the board.

I thought it was high too, but after speaking with some recruiters I understand that the market has changed over the past couple months. It's obviously not the same as big law, but seems like ID is also feeling some market pressure. I was hoping to get some insight from people actually working at these firms though, and not just get my info from recruiters.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MagnaCarter
  • Lawyer

That's interesting. I haven't heard anything about raises from my firm. Did the recruiter mention what the billable targets were for the $110,000 second year associate firms? I don't think the second year associates at my firm are paid $110,000 but our billable target is less than 1650. I'm aware of some insurance defence firms that have a 1700 billable target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
beyondsection17
  • Lawyer

Beard Winter and Bell Temple I believe are in that range. I thought I saw a job ad at McCague recently that suggested the pay was lower than that, but in all honesty I didn't look particularly carefully. I believe in-house ID salaries for juniors were actually growing higher than what you'd make at a standard ID firm for a while (and still are, in a not-insubstantial number of cases) so firms have felt pressure to increase their salaries or offer larger bonuses to keep their associates.

EDIT: For clarity, I work in-house, and not at any of these ID firms.

Edited by beyondsection17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MagnaCarter
  • Lawyer

I won't out those firms that I know pay less, but $110K for a second year ID associate seems a lot higher than what I remember.

It'll be interesting to see if ID firms can keep associates because their fixed rates are based on long-term per-negotiated contracts with insurers, who are always looking to give their business to the lowest bidder. Unless partners are willing to significantly eat in to their profits, I can't imagine ID rates going much higher or keeping pace with the market.

Anecdotally, I see Blaney McMurtry has scooped up a lot of juniors in recent years. In-house departments are also hiring a lot of juniors as well. It always looks like Intact is  hiring, which is not surprising because they have the most P&C market share. The average junior associate on the plaintiff side must be making less than their ID counterparts and not getting raises because the overwhelming trend I've seen is juniors heading into ID from plaintiff rather than the other way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By accessing this website, you agree to abide by our Terms of Use. YOU EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT YOU WILL NOT CONSTRUE ANY POST ON THIS WEBSITE AS PROVIDING LEGAL ADVICE EVEN IF SUCH POST IS MADE BY A PERSON CLAIMING TO BE A LAWYER. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.