Big decision regarding articling

[Goatbutter]

So I was offered an articling position at a government branch that I didn’t even apply to, MCCSS (I applied to another one and they recommended me, but I find it strange that they didn’t find anyone who actually interviewed there to hire). It’s more focused on working in policy than practice, and when I asked a prof about it he said it would be more policy focused with fewer transferable skills. I’m scared that if I take this I’m shooting myself in the foot regarding what happens after articling, but I’m also scared that if I don’t take this I won’t be able to secure an articling position at all. Please send advice/opinions 

[Garfield]

It sounds like the 24 hours that you are given to sit on the offer has elapsed but I will offer my thoughts anyway.

There are many great opportunities that arise throughout the school year. If it is not the area of law that you want, I don’t believe you should go for it.

With respect to that particular position, I have also heard that you do not gain as many transferable skills as you would in a typical firm position. (This is not to say that past articling students at MCCSS have not been hired back either at MCCSS or somewhere else at MAG and have had great careers coming out of that position.)

In other words, I don’t think you should “settle” for it out of fear of not getting a position, because it is quite early on. 

[Garfield]

Qualifications to my post above: 

Where I said that I heard that you do not gain as many transferable skills as you would in a typical firm position, that comment came from someone who was trying to get into a certain litigation field. I won't be providing more details as I want to preserve my anonymity. Feel free to PM me, though.

I heard from someone else that MCCSS is fantastic for policy, drafting legislation, and other solicitor work.